Emergency Departments (EDs) across the world are often the busiest and most challenging parts of the healthcare system. Every day, they receive patients with conditions ranging from minor injuries to life-threatening emergencies. In such an environment, making quick yet accurate decisions about who should be seen first is critical. This process—known as triage—is the foundation of modern emergency medicine.
Triaging ensures that the sickest patients are identified and treated without delay, while those with less urgent needs are cared for in a timely but appropriate sequence. In essence, triage is about matching the right care to the right patient at the right time. It is not only a clinical necessity but also a legal and administrative tool, helping hospitals justify their needs and plan resources effectively.
A Brief History of Triage
The roots of triage go back to the battlefields of the 19th century, where military doctors had to make difficult choices about which wounded soldiers could be saved with limited resources. In civilian healthcare, formal triage systems began taking shape in the 1960s in the United States.
Australia pioneered the Australasian Triage Scale (ATS), which became the model for several other countries. Today, widely recognized systems include:
-
Emergency Severity Index (ESI) in the United States
-
Manchester Triage System (MTS) in Europe
-
Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) in Canada
-
Australasian Triage Scale (ATS) in Australia
These systems categorize patients into 3–5 priority levels based on acuity. For example, a patient in cardiac arrest is treated immediately, while someone with a minor sprain may wait. In disaster situations, special protocols such as START (Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment) are used to manage large numbers of casualties efficiently.
The common thread across all these systems is the principle of prioritizing patients by medical urgency rather than order of arrival.
The State of Triage in Pakistan
Pakistan began experimenting with triage in the late 1990s in a few hospitals. Over time, more institutions introduced triage processes, but the adoption has been inconsistent. Today, different hospitals across the country use different triage systems—or in some cases, improvised local versions.
This lack of uniformity creates confusion. Physicians, nurses, and even patients encounter varying terminologies and protocols, making it harder to deliver consistent, safe care. More importantly, without a standardized national triage framework, it is difficult to collect meaningful data, compare outcomes, or plan improvements at a national level.
Yet, there is reason for optimism. Pakistan now has around 20 institutions running Emergency Medicine residency programs, producing a growing cadre of physicians formally trained in modern emergency care. This represents a turning point: for the first time, there is enough critical mass of expertise to think seriously about national standardization.
Why Pakistan Needs a Unified Triage System
Introducing a single national triage system would bring multiple benefits:
-
Earlier and safer care for sick patients: A standardized system would allow quick recognition and prioritization of critically ill patients, reducing delays in life-saving treatment.
-
Fairness and equity: Patients across Pakistan would be assessed using the same criteria, ensuring consistency regardless of where they seek care.
-
Better communication: A common language of triage would allow doctors, nurses, and paramedics to work together more effectively.
-
Improved patient trust: Families would better understand the process, reducing frustration and increasing cooperation.
-
Stronger data and monitoring: With uniform documentation, hospitals and policymakers could track trends, identify gaps, and measure the impact of reforms.
Ultimately, triage is not just about sorting patients—it is about building trust, ensuring safety, and enabling accountability.
The Way Forward
For Pakistan, the time to act is now. Emergency Medicine is no longer a niche specialty confined to a handful of urban hospitals. With a growing workforce of EM-trained doctors and nurses, the country has the human capital needed to standardize emergency care.
Moving towards a national triage system will require:
-
Consensus-building among policymakers, academic institutions, and healthcare leaders.
-
Adaptation of global best practices (such as ESI, MTS, CTAS, or ATS) to fit Pakistan’s unique resources, patient volumes, and healthcare realities.
-
Training and capacity-building to ensure that all healthcare professionals—from doctors and nurses to paramedics—understand and implement the system.
-
Policy support from government bodies to embed triage into national emergency care standards and regulations.
This is not just a clinical reform but a systemic shift that can elevate the quality of emergency care across the country.
Conclusion
Triage may seem like a small administrative step at the front desk of an Emergency Department, but in reality, it is a life-saving tool. Without it, chaos and inequity prevail; with it, hospitals gain structure, safety, and fairness.
Pakistan’s emergency medicine community now stands at a defining moment. With growing expertise and a nationwide presence, it is time to move beyond fragmented practices and work towards a single national triage system.
The question is no longer whether Pakistan should standardize triage—it is how soon we can make it happen.